Apache 160 vs Yamaha FZ-S: A Comprehensive Comparison
Introduction
When choosing a naked bike, options such as the Apache 160 and the Yamaha FZ-S are often top contenders. This article will explore the distinguishing features of both bikes to help you make an informed decision.
The Apache 160
The Apache 160 is a popular choice among motorcyclists for its distinctive naked bike look and lively performance. It boasts a strong engine and is well-known for its excellent acceleration and handling. However, there are a few drawbacks to consider.
Limited Fuel Efficiency
One of the major downsides of the Apache 160 is its fuel efficiency. Compared to the Yamaha FZ-S, the Apache 160 is not as fuel-efficient, which could lead to higher long-term running costs.
Vibrations and Comfort
Motorcyclists who have ridden the Apache 160 since 2008 report experiencing vibrations, particularly between 60-75 km/h. Continuous riding can also lead to numbness in the palms and fingers. However, it is worth noting that newer variants of the Apache might have addressed these issues. If you plan to ride for extended periods, consider checking if these have been improved in more recent models.
Sound and Aesthetics
The Apache has a distinctive sound that many riders find appealing. However, the lack of a wide rear tire can affect its overall look and performance. To enhance both appearance and performance, upgrading to the Apache 200V series might be a good option if your budget allows.
The Yamaha FZ-S
The Yamaha FZ-S offers a refined and elegant ride, with better clutch-gear smoothness and stability. It is widely recognized for its balanced handling and powerful yet smooth engine performance. Many riders find the FZ-S to be more comfortable and versatile, making it a popular choice for enthusiasts.
Fuel Efficiency and Power
The Yamaha FZ-S is praised for its superior fuel efficiency and powerful engine. It offers better performance in terms of both speed and smoothness, which is a significant advantage over the Apache 160.
Visibility and Style
Riding the Yamaha FZ-S is often likened to a seamless experience, with riders often making a positive statement in comparison to the Apache. The FZ-S's more refined design means that less attention is drawn to it by those behind, whereas the Apache is more noticeable.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the choice between the Apache 160 and the Yamaha FZ-S depends on your specific needs and preferences. If you value fuel efficiency and a more refined ride, the Yamaha FZ-S is the way to go. However, if you are drawn to the Apache's vibrant sound and budget is a concern, the Apache 160 could be the better choice.
Further Considerations
Both bikes have their merits, and it’s important to consider not just the technical specifications but also your personal riding style and preferences. Newer models might have addressed some of the issues mentioned, so researching and test-riding if possible is highly recommended.
Consistently ask yourself the following questions:
What is the expected usage of the bike? How important is fuel efficiency to you? Do you prioritize a refined ride or a more exciting and vibrant experience?By answering these questions, you can make a more informed decision between these two great choices in the naked bike market.