Royal Enfield Classic 500 vs Classic 350: A Comprehensive Guide on Handling, Maintenance, and Mileage
Introduction
When choosing between the Royal Enfield Classic 500 and Classic 350, it's crucial to consider several factors such as handling, maintenance, and fuel efficiency. This article delves deep into these aspects to provide you with a well-rounded comparison.
Handling
Classic 500: This model typically offers a more powerful engine, which can translate into a more engaging ride. However, its weight can sometimes make it feel cumbersome at lower speeds. This characteristic might be more noticeable during urban or tightcorner riding.
Classic 350: Conversely, the Classic 350 is known for its lighter frame, making it much easier to handle, especially in urban environments and when navigating tight corners. Its lightweight design enhances nimbleness and can be a significant advantage for everyday riding.
Maintenance
Classic 500: With a larger engine, the Classic 500 may require more frequent servicing due to the increased power and complexity. The cost of parts and overall service can be higher.
Classic 350: This model is generally easier and cheaper to maintain. The simpler engine and relatively affordable parts contribute to its reputation for reliability, leading to less frequent service needs.
Mileage
Classic 500: The larger engine means lower fuel efficiency. Expect around 25-30 km/l (kilometers per liter), depending on riding conditions and style. For a more brag-worthy figure, some riders have claimed up to 30 km/l in regular driving.
Classic 350: This model typically delivers better fuel efficiency, with mileage figures often ranging from 30-40 km/l, making it a more cost-effective choice for daily commuting.
A personal riding experience on the Classic 350 showcased exceptional fuel efficiency, achieving a remarkable 34 km/l on the highway.
Additional Considerations
Weight: Both models weigh approximately 200 kg. After installing a leg guard, the weight remains unchanged.
Power and Torque: Classic 350: 19.8 HP, 28 Nm Classic 500: 27.2 HP, 41.3 Nm
The top speed is almost the same for both models, though the Classic 500 reaches this speed slightly faster.
Vibrations: At around 50,000 INR, a leg guard can help reduce vibrations, enhancing comfort.
Conclusion
In summary, the Classic 350 stands out as the more efficient and cost-effective choice in terms of handling, maintenance, and mileage. If handling and cost-effectiveness are your priorities, the Classic 350 is likely the better choice. However, if you desire more power and a classic feel, the Classic 500 may be the right pick. Considering fuel economy alone, the Classic 350 towers with its better fuel efficiency figures.
To sum up, the Classic 350 is recommended unless you specifically need more power, in which case the Classic 500 would be the better option.