Why Do Current Generation Intel Processors Appear to Have Gone Backwards?

Why Do Current Generation Intel Processors Appear to Have Gone Backwards?

Often, when comparing current generation Intel processors with those of previous generations, one might wonder if Intel has taken a step backwards. This confusion arises particularly when we stand at the crossroads of comparing the i7-7700K with the i7-695, which are considered to be from different market segments and different price tiers. To understand the context and reason behind this perceived "backwards" movement, let's break down the differences and nuances.

Evolving Market Segments and Processor Categories

The use of the letter X in the X series processors stands for 'eXtreme' and denotes the most powerful processors in a particular generation. Therefore, the i7-695 and i7-795 (the next-gen replacement for i7-695) are part of this premium category. However, aiming for a real comparison requires a wait until the release of Skylake-X, which is rumored to be on the horizon by late May 2017. This next-gen variant will showcase processors with up to 24 cores and threads, a stark contrast to the existing X series processors.

Price and Market Segmentation

A direct comparison between the i7-7700K and i7-695 highlights the differing market segments they cater to. The i7-7700K is priced at $349, making it more accessible to a broader audience. On the other hand, the i7-695 is priced at $1,649.99, targeting a specialized market with stricter yield requirements due to its larger die size, which results in lower manufacturing efficiencies and higher costs.

While the target market for i7-695 is more niche, Intel can still meet this demand through strategic pricing and supply management, ensuring that the product reaches the hands of enthusiasts and professionals who require the highest performance possible.

Power Consumption and Cooling Requirements

Comparing the power consumption of these processors, the i7-695 requires 140Wh, whereas the i7-7700K requires only 91Wh. This difference in power consumption translates to a higher heat generation in the i7-695, necessitating liquid cooling for optimal performance. In contrast, the i7-7700K can operate efficiently with air cooling, making it a more accessible and practical choice for a wider audience.

Historical Trends in Processor Release Timing

Historically, Intel releases the standard 700K processors before the extreme series processors. For example, the i7-6700K, a 700K processor, was launched in Q3-2015, while the extreme series processors such as i7-6800K, i7-6850K, i7-6900K, and i7-695, were released in Q2-2016. This trend suggests that Intel is currently deviating from its usual pattern by releasing extreme processors sooner than expected. This strategic move is likely due to AMD's advancements in processor technology, which have prompted Intel to accelerate their release schedules to maintain their competitive edge.

A Comparative Analogy: The Automotive Industry

To put this into perspective, consider a car analogy. Comparing the i7-695 with the i7-7700K is akin to comparing a Bugatti Veyron 16.4, which was first released in 2005, with a modern car like a 2017 Dodge Charger Hellcat or even a 2015 Ferrari 488 Spider. While these modern vehicles are undoubtedly impressive, they represent the advanced technology available today.

Just as the Bugatti Veyron represents a significant leap in automotive history, it’s crucial to recognize that the current generation Intel processors are not going backwards but forward, incorporating the latest advancements and technologies. When comparing these processors to their predecessors, we must ensure we are comparing like with like. For instance, when comparing the Veyron with modern hypercars like the Porsche 918 Turbo, McLaren P1, or Ferrari LaFerrari, the advancements in performance and efficiency become more evident, much like the differences between current Intel processors and their predecessors.

In conclusion, while there may be a perceived backwards step in performance, it is more accurate to view this as a reflection of continued innovation and the introduction of new generations of processors that build upon the advancements of the past. The key lies in understanding the market positioning and technological context of each processor generation.